Image description: a screenshot from the Wikipedia page for the Doctor Who TV series, with a user-added caption that reads “Preserve the media you can before it’s gone forever.” The Wikipedia article reads, “No 1960s episodes exist on their original videotapes (all surviving prints being film transfers), though some were transferred to film for editing before transmission and exist in their broadcast form. [88] Some episodes have been returned to the BBC from the archives of other countries that bought prints for broadcast or by private individuals who acquired them by various means. Early colour videotape recordings made off-air by fans have also been retrieved, as well as excerpts filmed from the television screen onto 8 mm cine film and clips that were shown on other programmes. Audio versions of all lost episodes exist from home viewers who made tape recordings of the show. Short clips from every story with the exception of Marco Polo (1964), “Mission to the Unknown” (1965) and The Massacre (1966) also exist.”

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copyright should be set to its original 25 year limits. Then we wouldn’t have this problem in the first place.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Copyright makes a lot less sense with the internet.

      The barriers to entry to markets are so low.

      If I write a song, and you hear it, steal it and record it, I can’t really say “well hey man I was saving up money to get some studio time.”

      Virtually every market has an analogous situation with it’s copyright. Not all, but most.

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just noticed a Disney film with the 100 years logo, and realized they still have copyright on their OG stuff. Too bad. It was never meant to establish a dynasty, just a bit of crumb before your work went into public domain. Sigh…

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It would be less of a problem. But most of the media I consume is younger than that, and yet it is still at risk of going away at any moment. Nobody wants to even sell digital copies, except for the ones on CD, DVD, etc. Most of the time your only option is a “license” to access it, or a monthly subscription. A couple of years ago I “bought” the new Blade Runner on Google Play. Turns out now you can only watch above 480p on their approved devices. Which does not include my PC, my main device. The same goes for the streaming services, you get shafted on quality if you aren’t using a “smart” tv.