• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those cheap Chinese batteries aren’t “cheap” as in bad quality.

    They’re almost certainly using LFP batteries which are made in China right now, but they are incredible batteries.

    They’re cheaper because they use more common materials, the F and P being iron and phosphate which are plentiful. They’re also more environmentally friendly to procure those materials

    They’re also much safer than GMs current pouch batteries which are more prone to fire due to their chemistry, and form factor. LFP batteries are probably the safest you can have in a car right now. The chemistry itself is less fire prone, and their prismatic form factor is physically less prone to thermal runaway problems.

    And then, not only are they safer and cheaper, they last longer capable of thousands of cycles.

    But wait there’s more! Unlike other chemistries LFP batteries can be charged to 100% with minimal impact on degradation. So you can get more out of the battery instead of the 20-80% range being the optimal way to keep its best performance.

    The more cars we have using these batteries the better it’ll be. We should work to get local production of them as well.

    All the manufacturers are moving to use them, but one of their downsides is their lower energy density. You can’t get those 400 mile range cars out of them as they’d take up too much space. So they don’t work well in trucks, or long range vehicles. But they work perfectly in something like a standard range Bolt or Model 3 type vehicle.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      one of their downsides is their lower energy density. You can’t get those 400 mile range cars out of them as they’d take up too much space.

      Unlike other chemistries LFP batteries can be charged to 100% with minimal impact on degradation. So you can get more out of the battery instead of the 20-80% range being the optimal way to keep its best performance.

      This seems like a reasonable trade-off to make, no?

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh it’s absolutely worth it if you don’t want the 300+mile cars or trucks.

        And with enough time as the chemistry improves as they all do, they’ll slowly creep up making them an even better choice.

        I’m happy to see others adopting the tech.