Shuji Utsumi, Sega’s co-CEO, comments in a new statement that there is no point in implementing blockchain technology if it doesn’t make games ‘fun’.

  • cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’ve been wondering the same thing too, like what’s the point? I’ve seen some devs try to use blockchain for tracking ownership of items, so you could trade/sell items to others and it would all be tracked and verified through the blockchain. But if you’re playing a game that’s hosted by a centralized server, then just use a database. I don’t see any benefit for a decentralized blockchain when you’re playing on a centralized server.

    • SuperZutsuki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t a use case. They created a product and keep trying to shoehorn it into any industry they can.

      • TassieTosser
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The use case is being a buzzword they can use to scam cryptobros and the gullible.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like item duplication or flat out editing. I’m just trying to imagine anything useful about blockchain in gaming and I that’s all I can come up with.

          • Deestan@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, I see.

            The part about a blockchain that would prevent this cheating are incidental: Its remote nature and unique item IDs, which are abilities it shares with a regular database on the game server.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. To replace the game server in a peer to peer game where the host cannot be trusted, for example. You replace the central authority with a distributed authority. In theory. It seems to me a central game server would be easier, but I’d course the game stops working when the server shuts down. Blockchain would presumably allow the game to keep working as long as there is a player base to function as an authority. But this seems a contrived idea. I can’t imagine it would be better than a server in practice.