• MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As opposed to? I mean, yeah, a lot of the places marked here are bilingual and share a language with the surrounding environment, but it’s not like Spanish, Romanian or English aren’t captured here.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well showing area that has only minority of some speakers as the colour of that language is quite misleading. Should be shaded or something

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends. I think if both languages are exclusive to that area then yeah, flag it. If one is a larger language and the other a minority language exclusive to a region is fine to only show the minority one. Context solves the issue just fine.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t know from context what the actual language situation there is with that method. For informative maps that’d be bad. That’s why shading makes more sense.

            • MudMan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If your map is about where every language is spoken, then you shade where every language is spoken.

              If your map is about how a word is said on different languages, then you place words for unique languages, context takes care of bilingual areas.

              It seems pretty obvious, really.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And what’s wrong from a more correct representation that also shows the words, as in, shading?

                To me that seems obvious. You don’t mislead but also get the information through.

                • MudMan@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well, because you’d have to put two words in very tiny spaces of the map. Repeating “peace” in Wales seems superfluous, since England is right there. You’ll notice you don’t get béke rewritten in Transilvania, either.

                  It just seems like a weird hangup.

                  Anyway, moving on here. We’ve derailed the kind, warm, little dorky message of this thread enough.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not sure why you’d have to repeat the word.

                    It just seems like a weird hangup.

                    It’s just an unfortunate and misleading trend. But if you’ve ever been to MapPorn on Reddit, then yeah it’s not the most egregious example of those hah.