BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoWhere the money islemmy.oneexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1125arrow-down161
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkWhere the money islemmy.oneBlinkerFluid@lemmy.one to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarebort@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoI like it. you can visualize sizes with 3 orders of magnitude between them without one being microscopic. What makes this graph shitty, is that the spheres don’t look very 3D.
minus-squareOtakat@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoI respectfully disagree. If you want to compare orders of magnitude, you should use a logarithmic scale.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYeah these are long-ago settled, 101-level, wikipedia-level data visualization principles.
I like it. you can visualize sizes with 3 orders of magnitude between them without one being microscopic.
What makes this graph shitty, is that the spheres don’t look very 3D.
I respectfully disagree. If you want to compare orders of magnitude, you should use a logarithmic scale.
Yeah these are long-ago settled, 101-level, wikipedia-level data visualization principles.