- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Twitter is threatening to sue Meta over concerns about its new Threads app, according to a letter obtained by Semafor. In the letter, which is addressed to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter lawyer Alex Spiro argues that Meta used Twitterâs trade secrets and intellectual property to build Threads.
Spiro, who is also Elon Muskâs personal lawyer and a partner at the Quinn Emanuel law firm, claims that Meta hired âdozensâ of ex-Twitter employees to develop Threads, which wouldnât be all that surprising given just how many people were fired following Muskâs takeover.
But according to Twitter, many of these former workers still have access to Twitterâs trade secrets and other confidential information. Twitter alleges that Meta took advantage of this and tasked these employees with developing a âcopycatâ app âin violation of both state and federal law.â
As a result, Twitter is threatening legal action in the form of âboth civil remedies and injunctive relief.â It also âdemands that Meta take immediate steps to stop using any Twitter trade secrets or other highly confidential informationâ and says Meta isnât allowed to crawl or scrape Twitterâs data, either.
Meta responded to Twitterâs letter in a post on Threads, with communications director Andy Stone stating, âNo one on the Threads engineering team is a former Twitter employee â thatâs just not a thing.â Meta doesnât seem all too concerned about this, and that may be because Twitter isnât all that shy about threatening legal action. In May, Twitter accused Microsoft of abusing the companyâs API through integrations with some of its products.
Meta launched Threads on Wednesday night, with celebrities and brands the first to get on board. Less than 24 hours since the appâs launch, Threads has garnered over 30 million registered users, while internal data obtained by The Vergeâs Alex Heath indicates that users have already made over 95 million threads.
âCompetition is fine, cheating is not,â Musk said in a reply to a post about the letter on Twitter.
Does anyone else feel like the core concept of Twitter is not really that interesting in the first place
Iâve gotten some decent use from Twitter over the years, and it was nice they doubled the character count, but I very much prefer places where I can read and post over one paragraph at a time. The concept of 140 characters sort of made sense when it was based on MMS, but itâs not clear if anyone ever even used that after the first couple of years. People would make longer posts by replying to themselves and chaining a dozen posts, but that is an excruciating interface for something that could just be one long post. Plus then people could âlikeâ and reply to each segment individually which is sort of chaotic.
Reddit was the only social-media like site that was geared towards and appropriate for having longer discussions, but it seems like the owners want to dumb it down into TikTok/9Gag. Iâm glad Lemmy is here for people who want to use a bunch of words at once and express complete thoughts.
Me think why waste time say lot word when few word do trick. When me president, they see, they see. -Wayne Gretzky -Michael Scott -Kevin Malone
deleted by creator
Itâs not just you. Twitter doesnât now and never did anything Facebook doesnât already do. Itâs just a pared down Facebook experience.
It depends on what youâre looking for. For me, Twitter is basically an RSS feed of news and people I want to hear from. Itâs not a social media network for me. Thatâs why all I want is a reverse chronological feed.
This has been a thing Iâve been saying since twitter was purchased. For most people it was just a pretty RSS feed for whatever interests people had. Thatâs the only thing I ever used it for, for the 6 or so times I logged on over 9 years.
I wonder how many people use Twitter like that. There are so many communities that donât bubble up to the mainstream on Twitter that it makes me question whether Iâm an outlier or whether most people use it the way I do.
Twitter was an open canvas at first, thatâs what made it appealing. The users shaped it and norms formed. Then the bad men came.
To you it is not.