• logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    9 months ago

    I suspect ad blocking will always be an arms race. The server can only ask the client to play the ad, and then rely on the client to truthfully report whether it did so.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m sure they’ll try to implement some type of DRM BS into the web that allows them. It’s one of the good things about projects like Gemini. I used to think it was only good for the novelty of having a web alternative protocol.

      No doubt Big Tech would lobby for Microsoft to use Windows to flag Gemini browsers as malicious and then run FUD campaigns against the Gemini protocol

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        They already do this on the YouTube TV app

        It’s amazing how many times someone in this thread has joked about Google doing something absurd sounding only for it to already be true.

      • zurohki
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        You have to be careful with that sort of thing - some percentage of people who do watch the ads will close the tab rather than read the prompt and answer it.

    • shamrock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s only a matter of time before they start embedding them into the video like podcasts do and you won’t be able tell the difference between ad and video with software.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        Timestamps can still be voluntarily marked for an auto-skip feature to jump throughthe ads.