By brother sent me a Reddit post (I know) but without clicking it I was able to read the title and I bit of the description :D

Anyway, it basically said to follow rats in dungeons and they bring you to good loot. Ignore the predetermined dungeon path and just follow the rats.

I haven’t tried this myself but just wanted to share real quick!

  • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re making it sound like I’m spreading the worst conspiracy theory of all time my dude. You didn’t refute it with any evidence btw, you just said it’s pointless and the devs wouldn’t do this. But you had nothing to back it up like I don’t have any to back up mine, hence the “apparently” and the “I haven’t tried this myself”. But you, you are saying that blizzard wouldn’t do this as a 100% fact without saying you’ve tried this out to see if it works. You are doing exactly what you are saying I’m doing yet no where in my post did I say it’s a fact so your whole argument is invalidated by that one simple fact.

    You came and attacked my post point blank. You could’ve said something like “I’ve actually tried this but it didn’t seem like it’s a thing”. Instead you wrote an essay on how my post is pointless blah blah blah.

    Not really that hard to see in no way in my post am I preaching it like a fact which you seem to be implying. You woke up and chose violence

    Could have simply linked this video instead of projecting https://youtube.com/watch?v=3Do1Fkh65mw&feature=sharea

    If you shared any type of evidence it would’ve been a good argument, but you didn’t. So here I am shutting this rat theory down in my own post about it because I like to share evidence as I come across it instead of spewing some as a fact without anything to back it up

    If you would like to understand the definition of the word apparently here you go. Might do you some good https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/apparently

      • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only thing I’ll say about this is saying that providing evidence for something you claim is 100% is situationally dependent and never 100% required is very disturbing. No matter the situation if someone claims that there should be evidence.

        I would love to hear your reasoning on why people can go around spewing something as a undeniable fact without backing it up. I won’t even reply. I just want to see how you justify that. I’m not talking just for this situation, but any situation you think proof isn’t needed so a general sense.