• fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The cable reach of the current Tesla chargers is a blocker for many other EVs. Until v4 is rolled out more widely, it means most other EVs have to use the existing charger networks.

    It’s good to standardize on a single connector standard, but people have also been raising technical issues btw NACS and CCS1, especially in V2G / V2H / V2L scenarios.

    It’s not clear where we’ll end up 10-yrs from now.

    • cosmic_slate@dmv.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Worst case, an EV takes up 2 spots at a Tesla supercharger, but this might not be that big of a deal given how fast Tesla’s plopping down charging stations (not stalls, but entire stations). From Jan 1 to today there have been 600 new stations (not stalls) and we’re already starting to see V4 ones poke their head out. Assuming they keep the pace up, I don’t think it’ll take very long to have a sizable V4 network.

      For comparison, in just 1 year Tesla will have almost built out a full Electrify America-worth of charging stations (not stalls) as EA’s network only has 840 stations.

      As far as V2(G/H/L) goes, AFAIK the implementations aren’t cross compatible on CCS. The closest we got to a standard to this in the US was with CHAdeMO’s native support for the tech. NACS doesn’t bar a standard from being developed to handle this.