• kase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Neither of those are LGBT+ issues, for the record. I know one or two of the stories you’re talking about, one that was a drag performance and another about a book with a same-sex relationship, but the issue with either of those had nothing to do with their connection to LGBT+ topics–at least it shouldn’t have been, but they were treated that way. They should’ve been handled just like anything else inappropriate in a school, but at large, the problem was treated as them being drag or having LGBT+ characters.

    There’s no need for legislation for this kind of thing because the same things that are inappropriate for queer people to do in schools are already inappropriate for cis/het people to do. I’m not saying that in disagreement with what you said, just pointing it out in addition.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Neither of those are LGBT+ issues, for the record.

      One example was a book with illustrations of one dude giving another dude a blowjob, which falls squarely under G.

      Another one was a trans woman giving a lapdance to a junior high girl, which falls squarely under T.

      So, I’ll have to disagree.

      • JamesFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Except if you changed those situations so the acts were the same, but the people involved were all straight and cis, they’d still be a problem.

        Them being LGBT isn’t the problem. Them having NSFW content is, regardless of the specifics of that content, and the identities of the people involved.