• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Facts not every unhoused person wants to be housed

    Is that really true? Answer that first.

    Then, if so, answer this: why? That’s an important question.

    Do they just enjoy sleeping outside and being pissed on? Somehow I doubt it.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to what the other guy said:

      • not wanting to give up drugs

      • not wanting to give up pets

      • not wanting to give up the support structure (services, charities, other homeless) that they’ve spent a long time building up

      • straight up mental incapacity to live by themselves (schizophrenia, etc)

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but no one was talking about that.

          None of those things are cookies.

          None of those things are Hegelian dialectics.

          We could do this all day but I don’t see the point.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Housing first doesn’t have to interfere with any of that. A reasonable home will allow you to have a pet. They’ll need those support structures on the street or off, it wouldn’t make sense to cut them off. Anyone with a mental health issue is ONLY going to have a better time with a safe, private space they can call their own, and housing first means there’s no stipulation to getting off drugs, until you’re ready.

        Redefine housing as the FIRST step and not the pot of gold at the end of the societal expectation rainbow, and you’ll get a lot further.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Typically that’s how the “housing first” schemes I’ve seen work. It would be political suicide for a group to condone drug use in their public housing, and financial suicide to allow dogs (insurance would drop them) for example.

              It’s rarely as simple as “just do this simple thing and you solve this giant systemic problem”

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then that’s not housing first lol. Housing first means just that, housing FIRST. Before anything else. It’s worked in some countries, off the top of my head Finland. People don’t just get clean without safety, security, privacy, and dignity, and those things are practically impossible to achieve on the streets.

                This is one of those things that, yeah, actually. If we did the obvious, simple, humanitarian thing it’d work out to be drastically better for like, everyone except maybe the most well-off. The problem, as you alluded to, isn’t one of practicality but of politics.

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it is absolutely the case as I have seen in the thirty years I have volunteered with homeless shelters.

      Typically it is PTSD that sometimes leads to violent responses that makes these people want to be unhoused. We have a lot of vets in my country, The USA, who aren’t getting the mental health care they need. Some of these people are on the streets because they do not trust themselves around loved ones.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you get my point. It isn’t just a desire to be on the street because they think it’s cool and fun.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, it isn’t. “I don’t want to” doesn’t stand on its own. “I don’t want to live in a house” implies that they prefer living outside of one.

                • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You commented “So, you get my point. It isn’t just a desire to be on the street because they think it’s cool and fun.”

                  And it is the second sentence that I was referring to when I stated "I never said it was "

                  There are unhoused people who do not want to live in a house.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Stop dancing around the fucking point. It isn’t as simple as just not wanting a home. It’s knowing they can’t fucking manage the expenses and responsibility that are deliberately attached to owning a home. It’s trying to own a home and failing.

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, actually, it is. Saying any significant fraction of the homeless population wants to be homeless is at BEST ignorant, and most likely a smoke screen to distract from the actual discussion. You’ve yet to provide any rebuttal than “I’ve seen homeless people who didn’t want housing!” And nothing supporting it.