• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    On a national level there’s a lot of cheap places in sparsely populated areas. Just like the US.

    England has some “country” but it’s a much smaller percentage so city prices aren’t offset as much.

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      England also has a very unusual distribution for the population. The Greater London area is something in the order of 1/3 of the entire population alone.

      • hitmyspot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but the uk doesn’t have the spare non urban centres. The uk is densely populated throughout, pretty much.

        London to Brighton is really one big city, for instance.

        • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, but the uk doesn’t have the spare non urban centres

          There is plenty of space in the north of the UK, where the climate is far milder than in the immense majority of the territory in Canada.

          Windsor to Montreal is also really one big city. Unsurprisingly since it’s one of the areas with relatively mild climate, compared to places like Nunavut.

          Space is not the problem. The problem is that we welcome over a million people coming to the country per year and we are not building nearly enough housing for them.

      • nicetriangle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Crazy stat I heard is that 90% of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border while at the same time the country is the 2nd largest in the world.