Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy…blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every standard is wrong or limited in ways, it doesn’t make them useless. Utilitarian views can be useful, but it’s also easy to argue that euthanasia for the handicapped is moral from a Utilitarian perspective.

    • Poplar?@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Sure but what Matt is suggesting would mean we can hold something completely wrong, even an absurd one as a moral framework so long as we use it properly.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can. The absurdity is based on your inherent bias, the concept of absurdity is arbitrary.