You can’t get rid of it, you can only hide it: Microsoft imposes controversial Windows Backup on users::Like it or not, the Windows Backup app installed in Windows 10 and Windows 11 is here to stay, with Microsoft calling it a “system component” that can’t be

  • sock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    what do you mean by this

    do u think a cloud pc (with constant server costs) shouldnt be a monthly fee?

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is likely the “new only Windows option” in the not so distant future. I think it shouldn’t exist.

          • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Their primary use is enterprise not private consumers. Think of virtualized OS accessible over internet that you can manage/protect and provide for example to some random consultant. Or just provide more powerful PC on low end HW.

            It’s costly though and not sure it ever gained traction because there always were alternatives like Citrix Desktops.

            • Reygle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe there’s a use case, but I’m anti-cloud and always will be. I struggle to think of a situation I couldn’t do better with in-house (or even air gapped) VMs of my own.

              Anyone who watches 365 uptime knows that Microsoft’s cloud is a fragile laughing stock. They use a Twitter account because their own status portal is so laughably trash and unreliable. If you don’t believe me I don’t blame you. Here it is.

              The day I trust any cloud platform (Especially Microsoft) is the day I promise to jump off a cliff.

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thank you. Exactly. The term “cloud” is just code for “someone else’s computer” and as you say, there’s very little that cannot be done without it. And once you entrust your data to someone else’s hardware, all you really have are assurances and probabilities that what you expect will happen with it becomes what actually happens with it. No guarantees.

                And you pay for all this, monthly, until the end of time.

                I don’t blame anyone that wants to go that route, I use a freebie bit of cloud for phone photos myself, but anything of more import, nah. More “cloud” for everyone else, I suppose, because they can have my share.

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a confident guess about what Microsoft runs theirs on… it ain’t Windows.

          • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Can’t imagine it being the case, thin clients have existed for a very long time and Cloud PC is nothing revolutionary just an additional offering from Microsoft.

            Not to mention private consumers will not pay subscription for OS that in long run is a lot more expensive and worse HW that they probably already have.