SomeBoyo@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoIt gets better the longer it runsfeddit.deimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down110
arrow-up1504arrow-down1imageIt gets better the longer it runsfeddit.deSomeBoyo@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhew. I’m only going for 99.5%, which according to your other comment is doable!.. But impractical
minus-squarexthexder@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year ago99.5% would still be e^200 numbers checked (7x10^86). According to the Quora link in my other comment, we’ve only calculated the first 4x10^18 primes in sequence as of 7 years ago. 95% is very doable though.
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIncredible amounts of numbers. Crazy.
Whew. I’m only going for 99.5%, which according to your other comment is doable!.. But impractical
99.5% would still be
e^200numbers checked (7x10^86). According to the Quora link in my other comment, we’ve only calculated the first4x10^18primes in sequence as of 7 years ago. 95% is very doable though.Incredible amounts of numbers. Crazy.