Connecticut’s most wide-ranging gun control measure since the 2013 law enacted after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting takes effect Sunday, with proponents vowing to pursue more gun legislation despite legal challenges happening across the country.

The new law, signed by Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont in June, bans the open carrying of firearms and prohibits the sale of more than three handguns within 30 days to any one person, with some exceptions for instructors and others.

“We will not take a break and we cannot stop now, and we will continue to pass life-saving laws until we end gun violence in Connecticut. Our lives depend on it,” said Jeremy Stein, executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure. How many poor people were working in the financial sector when the banks misrepresented the value of mortgage backed securities and sold them to pension funds?

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fine. If you narrowly define crime as that which involves a gun I am fairly confident you will find that it relates to income levels.

          Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Crimes” of despair added in maybe, maybe not. Things are criminalized that enough money means not really (epstein’s island), privacy to snort/smoke/inject drugs of choice, solicit sexual services; bribes, embezzlement, tax evasion; and not all crimes are equal, nor should be criminal.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are multiple orders of magnitude more poor people, and per capita they commit more gun crimes than the rich.

        Surely this is due to desperation and lack of opportunity and minimal access to mental health care. But we’re not fixing any of that, are we.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe the rich can afford to have their gun crimes committed for them?

          But we’re not fixing any of that, are we.

          Of course not. Perhaps because it would work?