• beatle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I notice it’s never compared to a traditional burial which is better for the environment.

      • beatle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Concrete? Wood and a tiny bit of metal is fine in the earth.

        • Magickmaster@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cardboard? Our graveyard here uses the fancy coffins only for the ceremony and the burial itself is done in what amounts to a special cardboard box that helps to quickly decompose the body in the ground.

          • beatle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds a lot better for the environment. I’m surprised the Americans use cement.

        • its_pizza@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where I live, the weather is very dry, yet cemeteries have lush green grass like golf courses. They are heavily watered all summer long.

          I think in a rural area where land is plentiful, burial is not a big concern. In an urbanized area, a dead body would be competing for housing, park, or business space, and consuming resources all the while.

          The coffins are placed in concrete outer boxes, because a “lease” for a grave goes for 25-100 years. Then they take the whole thing out and another coffin takes it’s place. The concrete protects the coffin so that it can later be moved.

          Whatever kind of process that can decompose me in the most sustainable way, I’m all for it. No need to put on a show, only to dump my body somewhere else in 50 years when everyone has forgotten about it.

    • lildictator@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m concerned about efficient land use in traditional burials. Where I live you will often see cemeteries in the middle of the town with graves that are so old that no living relatives will ever visit – anybody who knew the deceased has long passed as well.

      We don’t need to preserve bodies, we need to dispose of them and let the living use the land instead. E.g. build proper parks with amenities for the living instead of hotels for the dead.

      • beatle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If people buy land it isn’t much different to anyone holding land for generations.

    • withersailorOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that’s because burial uses space. Space is expensive. And we insist on burying people lying down instead of upright.

      • beatle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Melting people and flushing them down the toilet may be a way to solve overcrowding. I take issue with it being marketed as the eco option.

  • withersailorOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Boil in the bag. Like sous-vide,” explains one mourner to another. “You get flushed. Down the drain. Out to sea. The end.”