The YouTube channel “Maximum Fury” conducted a technical test of the new Cyberpunk add-on called “Phantom Liberty” on an older AMD hardware system, testing it separately on Linux and Windows 11. The Linux system, specifically the Fedora distribution called Nobara, performed significantly better, delivering 31% more frames compared to Windows 11.

The hardware used for testing included an Asrock B550 motherboard with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU and an AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT GPU from the first RDNA generation, along with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM. The CPU, RAM, and GPU were overclocked, and the system utilized undervolting to save energy costs.

When testing the game at 1080p resolution with high textures, the Linux system achieved an average of 63.72 frames per second (fps), while Windows 11 managed only 48.55 fps. This suggests that the game should run noticeably smoother on the Linux system.

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wait, DLSS doesn’t work on Linux at all? That’s a pretty big thing to gloss over whenever someone is talking about linux gaming and how comparable it is to windows nowadays. I doubt I’d be able to get anything remotely close to a stable framerate on cyberpunk2077 without it, and same goes for other newer games like dying light 2 or starfield!

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        9 months ago

        DLSS works. It took a while longer than Windows, but Nvidia themselves actually provide Wine-compatible DLL files. Also, there’s a native way to implement DLSS for Linux which, I kid you not, zero games so far are using. The Windows version works fine though.

        But DLSS Frame Generation and Ray Reconstruction do not work, and there are zero workarounds.

        • Kaldo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh, so he’s just talking about DLSS3 features, gotchya. I thought DLSS 1 performance improvements are also frame generation but I see now thats different

          • deadcream@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            DLSS is upscaler. Game is rendered at lower resolution and then image is upscaled in a bit smarter way than simple “stretching”.

            • kadu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              More precisely, DLSS is a set of models that use AI to interpolate an image. This interpolation can take many different forms:

              Interpolation can be used to take a lower resolution image and upscale it, which is the main feature of DLSS.

              You can also use DLSS to take a high resolution image and scale it down, with less artifacts, as a type of antialiasing. This is DLDSR.

              You can also use it to take information from an image, combined with motion data, and interpolate how blocks of pixels might change into a new frame. This allows you to generate intermediary frames. This is Frame Generation.

              You can also take a very noisy image, composed of discrete dots, and interpolate how neighboring pixels should look. This is Ray Reconstruction.

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Aren’t frame generation and ray reconstruction new? I’m sure they’ll work one day, although I’m not a big Linux head I only use steamos on the deck I just see a lot of Linux posts on Lemmy so here I am lol.

          • kadu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            They’re new, yes. Though the folks at Proton already confirmed they’ll provide no workaround to support it, Nvidia needs to build the Linux drivers with official support. We don’t know if they’ll do that and when.

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Plain DLSS definitely works, I’m guessing they mean that specific reconstruction feature. I’m sure it’ll be implemented eventually if it’s possible at all though.
        Side note, a kind of related feature that is missing for sure from the Linux drivers is DLDSR, and plain DSR for that matter. As a heavy user of both, it’s a bit of a personal deal breaker.

      • fazo96@lemmy.trippy.pizza
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        DLSS works fine on Linux, but I don’t know about frame generation and ray reconstruction specifically. It could be those two don’t work yet.

    • rush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      DLSS is a matter of Nvidia’s sub-par driver support. FSR2 (and soon FSR3, which does frame gen.) works, ironically even on Nvidia GPUs :P

    • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      DLSS ray reconstruction works in Linux. You just need to launch with DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 VKD3D_CONFIG=dxr11 %command%.

        • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No, it’s definitely working. Here’s proof (open the images in a new tab and zoom in on the reflections to see the difference in clarity):

          With reconstruction:

          Without reconstruction:

          With reconstruction:

          Without reconstruction:

          With DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 and ray reconstruction enabled, reflections are much clearer and also resolve way faster during motion.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also no HDR, either (not supported by the OS). You’re not getting the full Cyberpunk experience without HDR and Ray Reconstruction. But I suppose that people with an older PC and monitor would benefit by switching to Linux.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        I already got the full cyberpunk experience 3 years ago, and it was terrible. Making the game prettier doesn’t make it any less of a joke.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I used to say things like this too, but then I played 2.0.

          Surprisingly it’s a proper game now. They turned the game into GTA in the future, and that’s a good thing. Also the perk system was completely overhauled, and weapons rebalanced so that you actually have to do more than just grab whatever has the highest DPS.

          The story’s the same, but everything else is completely different. Give it another chance.

          • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’ve tried it. It absolutely is not “GTA in the future”. It’s just as shallow as it was at launch.