… if you know how to use virtual desktops and shortcuts. You can’t look at two screens at a time, anyways.
One use case I can understand is having a 2nd monitor for checking stock prices or checking for a certain event. Other than that, I don’t see how it contributes to “productivity” while working or coding for example.
P.S: Tiling WM users may understand this post more
Funny how you seem to believe that “checking stock prices” is a good use of a whole monitor but don’t seem to see how literally any other task could benefit from having reference material up on a second monitor.
I think they mean anything where changes happen without your input, because you might see it in your corner of your eye, whereas reference material can be switched to almost as fast as you can look to the side. Typing as you’re reading though…
Because lots of productivity tasks, including coding, involve looking at a reference material while creating the output. I’m frequently looking at a database structure on one window, an API document on another, and coding in an IDE.
You don’t necessarily need two screens, but it helps to have enough real estate to view two or more applications at once. Personally I use a 50" 4k TV and tile things in halves or quarters - which is the equivalent of having four 1080 monitors.
Agree. Whenever I am away from home and code on laptop I am annoyed for a few days with switching between apps.
Going back to two monitors again feels like a blessing when I get back home.
You basically had the same answer as me for a good bit lol. But yeah. This is why.
Yeah I think we both replied with the same basic answer at the same time, you just beat me by a minute or two.
Even office jobs benefit. I noticed every work station at the big medical group I go to now have two monitors. a company doesn’t spend money on so many extra monitors without reason.
Lol an actual unpopular opinion. I use 4 monitors. Sometimes I’m looking at reference documents on a second monitor to determine how to implement the function. Sometimes I have my dbms app up on the third screen so I can look at the data structure as I’m implementing it. And the 4th monitor is usually for YouTube so I have a background noise/video to keep me focused
Damn I only have 3 monitors, I wish I had 4. I could have like 6 honestly.
If colour and response time don’t matter then consider a 4k tv. I use a 50" and it’s a great format.
I’ve got an ultra wide, and two 27" monitors, and wish I had 2 more 27" sometimes.
As someone who has 4 screens at work and 3 at home, you’ve done a great job picking a truly unpopular opinion, as I had a gutteral negative reaction when I saw this.
Should I upvote because it is an unpopular opinion or down vote because he is wrong? I know it’s the former but I really don’t want to!
Is it an unpopular opinion though or just a really stupid fucking take?
“Useful for checking stock prices” - I mean come on.
LMAO seriously
What’s faster, switching desktops or turning your eyes a bit to the side?
Was going to downvote this until I saw the community. You have a terrible opinion. Well done.
I felt the same way until I started using two monitors. Then I wanted 3. Using multiple desktops didn’t compare for me personally.
You can’t look at two screens at a time, anyways.
Unless you are sitting right in front of a single 50inch+ screen, your field of view can definitely accommodate more than one screen!
How else am I going to play games while watching a Twitch stream?
Yeah! How am I going to watch my favorite YouTubers while I play games?
And then have to rewind it because actually trying to pay attention to 2 simulating things at once is hard for me.
There’s a TON of reasons for a second monitor, but the biggest undisputable reason is to be able to monitor something while doing work on your main monitor.
Switching virtual desktops every few minutes to check the progress of something is crazy.
I have 3 monitors and it’s not enough. I’m convinced anyone who thinks 1 monitor is fine is slower and less efficient at any job than those with 2+
Except vitual desktops can’t quite replicate the usefulness of a second screen in portrait orientation.
I’m a mobile phone only person outside of work, but for work I refuse to exist with less than 3 screens: One main one for working, the screen of my docked laptop for references and documentation, and a 90° tilted screen with my Outlook calendar and Teams constantly open so that I can always check them both on a glance (got all Teams and Outlook notifications off since they’re distracting).
Honestly, I’m actually thinking about either upgrading my main screen to something curved/ultrawide or getting a fourth one, but the extra weight might actually be a concern for my stand/sit desk lol
I have 3 27" 4k screens in this layout: | - -. That’s from left to right, portrait landscape landscape.
I have a terminal and sometimes on the 1st screen. Code/Work on the second. Documentation/chats/email on the 3rd.
It works well for me :)
One screen is fine if it’s huge :)
You really can see more than one at a time, though. I have a lot of tasks in my day that take some minutes to complete.
When I’m working on two screens, I can leave the window open running the task on one screen, and work on something else or read the news or whatever on the other screen. When my task is done, I notice right away and get on with the next step.
When I’m working on just one small laptop screen, I have to remember to switch back and check periodically. It takes me much longer to notice the task is done this way, and distracts me from whatever I’m trying to get done in the meantime while waiting.
Two screens, or anyway enough real estate that I don’t need to full-screen the app I’m working in, is extremely useful to me for this reason.
