• moog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Self Checkouts are not job killers. they still need people to run them. Most stores have 3 SCO clusters that need 3 attendants each per day. thats 9 jobs right there, add in weekend coverage, vacations, part timers, etc and most grocery stores will have a need for around 15 cashiers which is not easy for any store to fully staff.

    source: ive worked grocery stores for around 10 years.

    • xanu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      How many people are needed to run an equivalent amount of non self checkouts? Just because they need some employees doesn’t mean they aren’t reducing the amount of jobs overall.

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is not a one to one comparison, sco is significantly slower than the cashier (not sure about US but here Aldi/Lidl cashiers are madness). So i will just put a random number here but the ratio might be something lik 1:3 where 1 cashier would swap 3 SCOs. I still believe it is reducing staff and that is the whole point.

      • moog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Our sco clusters have 6 stations each. you literally couldnt fit 18 more registers in our store let alone staff them. We have 8 registers and we’ve not once been able to fully staff those registers. at any given time we can find staff for maybe 4 of them.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Idk where you live but around here they used to have 10 cashiers open at busy days. Now it’s 20 self checkouts and 3 people “watching”. It absolutely got rid of some jobs.

      • moog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve never seen or heard of someone getting fired and replaced by a SCO. it just doesnt happen.

        • Steak@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah they just wait until they quit and then don’t hire another person. Duh

          • moog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            No actually they dont. Ive worked in grocery stores for 10 years that is not how it works.

            • Steak@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              How does it work then? And why would stores invest in these if it didn’t save them money?

              • moog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Because cashiering sucks ass? and no one wants to do it so theyre constantly understaffed. being a SCO attendant is nicer for the employees and the customers a lot of the time. but its not feasible for every transaction so there will still always be a need for cashiers. Maybe you shouldnt talk about something you havent done yourself cause im not explaining this to you any more.