Quaxamilliom [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agolol, lmao evenhexbear.netimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1171arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1171arrow-down1imagelol, lmao evenhexbear.netQuaxamilliom [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square99fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSouthEndSunset@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYes. I read that. Youre not getting my point.
minus-squareGay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·1 year agoThe problem is your orginal statement. “Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like” would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.
minus-squareSouthEndSunset@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoYeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks.
minus-squarePbSO4 [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoIf only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from
Yes. I read that. Youre not getting my point.
The problem is your orginal statement. “Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like” would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.
Yeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks.
If only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from