thehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1144arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1140arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKalash@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Doesn’t matter. The option to pay for some more content is literally what I’m hopeing for.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前yes it does matter. These are businesses. They make money by selling things. You cannot compare one rereleasing the same game with minimal changes for new money to keep supporting an existing game without charging new money.
minus-squareKalash@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前It doesn’t to me. They can re-release the game with an updated engine or just add more content via DLCs and expansions, I’ll take either.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前and thats fine, but doesnt make it possible to compare apples and oranges.
Doesn’t matter. The option to pay for some more content is literally what I’m hopeing for.
yes it does matter. These are businesses. They make money by selling things. You cannot compare one rereleasing the same game with minimal changes for new money to keep supporting an existing game without charging new money.
It doesn’t to me. They can re-release the game with an updated engine or just add more content via DLCs and expansions, I’ll take either.
and thats fine, but doesnt make it possible to compare apples and oranges.