I want to live!

- EvilKirkā€™s last words

Whatever else you want to say about EvilKirk, itā€™s pretty clear that he didnā€™t want to be merged back into the single Kirk. Despite this, there is no shortage of reasons why it was a good idea to merge the Kirks: the Enterprise needed its CO back, GoodKirk wanted to do it, and it seems possible that the strain of remaining split would have eventually killed EvilKirk anyways. However, the fact remains that EvilKirk did not consent to the procedure which ended his existence.

Clearly the circumstances here are quite different and thereā€™s basically no argument to be made that allowing EvilKirk to continue to exist would benefit any involved party, EvilKirk included. But for the purposes of this comparison, the only fact that really matters is that EvilKirk was just as passionate about his desire to continue existing as Tuvix was.

Yetā€”and itā€™s obvious where Iā€™m going with thisā€”ā€œSpock murdered EvilKirkā€ is not a meme.

So what gives? Did Spock murder EvilKirk or not? If yes, why does he get a pass while Janeway is condemned?

  • Equals@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Yetā€”and itā€™s obvious where Iā€™m going with thisā€”ā€œSpock murdered EvilKirkā€ is not a meme. ā€¦[W]hy does he get a pass while Janeway is condemned?

    Iā€™m gonna cheat here a little bit. There are lots of things about the Tuvix debate that really are not about Tuvix; weā€™ve seen Tuvix elicit underlying opinions about everything from abortion to the trolley problem, and weā€™ve often seen thinly-veiled misogyny lurking beneath the surface as certain folks appear interested in finding any flaws in Captain Janeway they can.

    So, yes, somewhat trivially, I think that Spock does not get condemned in part because he enjoys the luxury of not being targeted by misogynists. I think itā€™s a small part, but surely a part.

    I think the reason there arenā€™t memes is because, wellā€¦ ā€œThe Enemy Withinā€ is an old episode, it never attracted attention through debate, and also itā€™s a gross episode where EvilKirk straight up attempts to rape Yeoman Rand, and then Spock makes a joke (! Spock! A joke!) about it at the end of the episode. Iā€™m sure itā€™s an episode numerous folks have tried to forget. (I know I have.)

    So, in terms of using the episode as a barometer to evaluate our own reactions to the two situations, I think there are overriding contextual factors that drown out any insight we might gain.

    As an aside, I also think there is a pretty straightforward argument that EvilKirk (and GoodKirk, for that matter) was not mentally competent. He was, by definition, the remnants of an individual who had had a significant piece of their person torn away from them traumatically.

    I think thereā€™s actually an odd but useful comparison to dementia here: dementia does cause some individuals to behave ā€œout-of-characterā€, immorally, or just meanly. If there were a ā€œtransporter reintegrationā€ equivalent to treating dementia, and the patient said, ā€œNo, I want to stay like I amā€ā€¦ then I think probably the patientā€™s wishes would be ignored.

    Part of the reason ā€œTuvixā€ is hard is because, at least superficially, Tuvix appears mentally competent, so itā€™s much harder to justify ignoring his wishes.

    (As a second aside, one thing that always surprises me about the Tuvix Discourseā„¢ is how little attention is paid to Tuvix beingā€¦ well, somewhere between an asshole and a creep. He is incredibly manipulative toward Kes, preying on both her feelings for Neelix as well as her mentoring relationship with Tuvok. Neelix of course always was a bit possessive and jealous, but he at least was written ā€œwith a good heartā€; I felt like Tuvix took those same qualities, but added a Tuvok-esque cold calculation to it. In any case, to me thereā€™s a mildly interesting parallel between these two episodes where thereā€™s this tone-deafness to the way the writers treat the behavior of the ā€œtransporter accident individual.ā€)

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Part of the reason ā€œTuvixā€ is hard is because, at least superficially, Tuvix appears mentally competent, so itā€™s much harder to justify ignoring his wishes.

      It also helps that both good and evil Kirk were slowly dying due to that traumatic separation, hence their need to be reintegrated before it was too late.

      By comparison, Tuvix seemed stable, and there was no pressing need to have them be reintegrated before they both died. It seemed uncharacteristically spiteful to have him be forcefully dragged off to be separated with a risky procedure, whilst still begging for his life, with the only words Captain Janeway having about the situation being ā€œsorry, I need my science officer backā€.

  • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    why does he get a pass while Janeway is condemned?

    Firstly, the episodes are doing completely different things, and have completely different presentations. ā€œThe Enemy Withinā€ uses the transporter malfunction to examin the duality of man, and doesnā€™t address the ethics of the situation in any way. Thatā€™s going to inform the viewersā€™ reactions, just as bringing Janewayā€™s decisions regarding Tuvix to the forefront of that episode informs the viewersā€™ reactions of that.

    Secondly, Tuvix himself would have agreed with Spock - at least, at first. He was initially an active participant in trying to find a way to undo the situation. Over time, though, he changedā€¦and so did Janeway and the Voyager crew. Tuvix is given a name. Heā€™s given a job. Janeway calls him an officer and an advisor.

    In short, Janeway granted Tuvix personhoodā€¦and then unilaterally stripped it away.

    • Guy Fleegman@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      To point one, yep, fair. Iā€™ve unceremoniously dropped ā€œThe Enemy Withinā€ into a context it was never intended to be examined from.

      To point two, I agree that Janeway was both the source and the termination of Tuvixā€™ personhood, but I donā€™t see the relevancy. What bearing does Tuvixā€™s personhood have on how we describe Janewayā€™s actions, or the discussion about whether those actions were justified?

          • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            Iā€™m admittedly dancing around EvilKirk a bit, because the episode engages with the two Kirks in such a way that theyā€™re treated as a problem to be fixed, rather than a moral dilemma.

            The Tom Riker situation is perhaps more fitting in terms of the way the episode itself handles the situation. Of course, that episode also is fairly uncompromising about Will and Tom each being individuals with the right to liveā€¦

          • vegivamp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            I think thatā€™s an oversimplification of what GP was getting at.

            Tuvix was an accident, knew and accepted that fact, and initially was voluntarily assisting in finding a way to undo it. He seems more than capable of grasping, even at that early point in his existence, that undoing the accident means the end of him.

            GP made the argument that his demeanor started changing as he got a name, a job, responsibilities etc. All the superficial hallmarks of a ā€œpersonā€ in the very limited environment of the ship.

            Nobody is saying he wasnā€™t a person from the start, but getting assigned all the trappings of what he saw to be individual persons undoubtedly started him thinking of himself as a person as well instead of just an accident to be corrected.

            • vegivamp@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              Iā€™m going to add to that, as this post made me rewatch it as we speak šŸ™‚

              The two very first lines Tuvix speaks, when challenge 6 for his identity, are ā€œI am luitenant Tuvok. And I am Neelix.ā€

              He really didnā€™t realize he was a person yet - he thought he was two persons.

              Had you asked, in that initial time, whether he would like to be split up, Iā€™m sure he would have answered in the positive.

              Of course heā€™s allowed to change his mind as realization grows, so the whole thing remains a dicey proposition, but imo it just reinforces the fact that it was Janeway who triggered his (becoming aware of his own) personhood.

  • khaosworks@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Isnā€™t the main difference that neither could survive if they remained separated? They would both eventually die unless they were reintegrated.

    Whereas in Tuvixā€™s case, the merged being was in no danger of death and could have lived a long healthy life.

    • Guy Fleegman@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      That is true and to @ValueSubtractedā€™s point, speaks to the fundamental difference between the morality tale that each episode is setting up for our consideration. ā€œThe Enemy Withinā€ aims to make the viewer uncomfortable by suggesting that Kirkā€™s decisiveness is derived from his ā€œevilā€ half and isnā€™t offering any commentary on the personhood of the ā€œevilā€ half. So much so that they short circuit that possibility by slapping an expiration date on EvilKirk.

      Best I can give you is that itā€™s still technically murder if you kill a condemned man.

      • kbity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Killing two people who are both destined to die in the very near future to save one who will live for a considerably longer period and save a greater number of lives would be the right thing to do from a utilitarian standpoint. Tuvix, meanwhile, is a healthy being who was competent to discharge his duties and posed no threat.

        Consequently, while there is an argument to be made that killing one person to revive two others is a net benefit, the burden of suffering on that one person is extreme, and whether or not it is outweighed by the positive nature of the two others returning to live is very much a matter of individual outlook.

        It is also worth noting that Tuvok and Neelix as they existed before could be considered ā€œalready deadā€ as a result of their combination into a single entity. Thus you could argue that what actually happened is that Tuvix ā€œdiedā€ so that clones of the deceased Tuvok and Neelix could be created from him. Admittedly this is a shaky argument given the whole ā€œdo transporters actually kill people in-universeā€ thing.

    • popemichael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Could they? Vulcan physiology is weird.

      While robust physically, mentally they can have issues that are hard to fix in the delta quadrant.

      It feels too risky to me with the already known unknowns.

  • jrs100000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    I would say Neelix is a big part. Starfleet officers have already consented to the possibility that they might be ordered to their death for the good of their ship or the Federation. While their transformed versions may not have been exactly the same beings as the originals, there is still some ethical cover in that some version of them in the past had accepted these risks. Neelix, however, was not a Starfleet officer and had made it very clear that he did not consent to having his life sacrificed for the greater good of Voyager.

    Just how much this ethical baggage from either side carried over to a new being is unclear; it certainly would have been less unclear if it had been two officers merged together and not a civilian passenger.

        • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Thatā€™s the wrong comparison: you canā€™t in any way get back the mother. Tuvix wasnā€™t just an error of the transporter like Will/Tom Riker, it was a monster built from harvesting the organs of two living being AND it was possible to get them back if you destroy it. Easiest moral choice ever

          • vegivamp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            All of that doesnā€™t change the fact that Tuvix did not kill anyone. You initial premise is flawed.

    • Shift_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Yes, finally, some common sense. Neelix did not consent to die for Starfleet. Tuvok did not consent to die to become Tuvix. Neither consented to staying as Tuvix, because Tuvix was his own person and could not make decisions for them.

      Nobody protests Tom and William Riker staying separate despite literally being the same person. Why not extend the same logic to Tuvok and Neelix? If a clone can be itā€™s own person, then why is the well being of two individuals cast aside?

  • TeaHands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    I always got the impression that the Kirks were both destined to wither away and die if kept separate, but itā€™s been a while so I might be wrong there.

    Thereā€™s also the issue that EvilKirk was a danger to everyone else on the ship. You could make the argument that if he survived, he could have learned to control his behaviour, but Iā€™m not sure thatā€™s the case for a personality entirely made up of those negative traits.

    Itā€™s definitely a moral grey area, whereas with the Tuvix situation itā€™s more black and white. There was no danger to anyone else, he was well-liked and a credit to the ship, there was basically no reason for Janeway to split him back apart other than ā€œI want toā€.

    • Guy Fleegman@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Janewayā€™s decision was far from arbitrary. She did it to save the lives of Tuvok and Neelix, who were unable to advocate for themselves at the time.

      • Shift_@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        YES!
        EXACTLY!

        Everyone wants to save Tuvix because they like him. But nobody wants to save Tuvok or Neelix. They didnā€™t consent to dying so Tuvix could live. If you agree Tuvix is a person, then you cannot disregard that so were Tuvok and Neelix. Where was their funeral? Does Tuvokā€™s family not get itā€™s husband and father back because the crew liked Tuvix better? The two people whoā€™s opinion mattered the most couldnā€™t be consulted. If Tuvix is a person, his judgement on the matter is simply too biased as his sense of self preservation would interfere with objective decision-making.

        To save Tuvix was to murder Tuvok and Neelix.

        • vegivamp@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          To save Tuvix was to murder Tuvok and Neelix.

          They couldā€™ve attempted to recreate the Riker accident. Copy the datastream before itā€™s split. Surely thereā€™s the technical knowledge to do it.

          Itā€™s also interesting that at the end of the episode, they never go into Tuvok and Neelixā€™ memories of the whole thing - they donā€™t seem surprised to be in sickbay instead of the transporter room, so theyā€™re clearly aware of what happened. They could have at least asked them at that point whether theyā€™re happy to be back of if they would like to be merged again - theyā€™ve shown that itā€™s just a matter of having the orchid in the same transport.

          In fact, that theyā€™re not confused by the - for them individually - new memories, like Tuvix was when he first came into being, could actually suggest that they were both actively present to some degree inside Tuvixā€™ personalityā€¦

          Aside from all that, the way they explain the orchidā€™s effect means that it would never have been safe to have Tuvix in a shared transporter stream: the orchidā€™s means of reproduction is basically to merge with another species through the use of a particular enzyme, so it stands to reason that Tuvix is the orchidā€™s offspring and also possesses that enzyme.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      he could have learned to control his behaviour, but Iā€™m not sure thatā€™s the case for a personality entirely made up of those negative traits.

      But what does it even mean to be ā€œmade up of negative traitsā€? Would he have been completely unable to learn? To realise that, maybe, sometimes, there is benefit in not being ā€œevilā€, even for entirely selfish reasons? And who says that GoodKirk couldnā€™t also learn to be more assertive? (psychotherapy must be easily available in our socialist future, especially for high-ranking Starfleet officers, as well as plenty time off for mental health reasons)

      Itā€™s not like Kirkā€™s positive and negative traits are inherent, he wasnā€™t born with them, but they are a result of his lifeā€™s experiences. So could one make the argument that both would just need time to adjust?

      • TeaHands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        See this is exactly what I mean. The Kirk example is a grey area, that in real life would lead to way too many questions than could be answered in a single TV episode. Itā€™s an interesting thing to think about though, and gets into the whole nature vs nurture debate that we saw tackled a bit in episodes like the DS9 one with the baby Jemā€™Hadar. If youā€™re ripped apart into two beings like that, are you essentially ā€œbornā€ good or evil and would you have the capacity for change?

        Could each Kirk have gone on to become psychologically stable? Maybe, maybe not. Did merging them save one combined life that wouldā€™ve otherwise soon expired, or did it murder two individuals who couldā€™ve gone on to have long happy lives? Lots of questions, ripe for debate. A grey area.

        Whereas in the Tuvix example, thereā€™s nothing really grey about it. And regardless of which side you come down on in the Kirk debate, thatā€™s why I believe Janeway gets all the flak and Spock does not.

  • crowebear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Well, (and this isnā€™t exactly an answer to your question), one thing thatā€™s interesting to consider isā€¦ if Spock killed Evil Kirk, he also killed Good Kirk. In other words he killed two people to save one (if you want to look at each of them as individuals in a sense equal to the original). Janeway ā€œkilledā€ one person to save two.