There was previously discussion about Russell Brand denying allegations that were to be shown in a TV documentary, and now things are developing.

  • Decompose@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    How to destroy anyone’s life if you hate them:

    1. Accuse them of sexual assault from 2000 years ago, and rely on dumb people’s emotions and corruption.
    2. Profit!

    Clown world.

    • QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. There hasn’t been any need to fabricate sexual assault allegations. Brand has had a long history of unwanted sexual advances and in the ages before #MeToo he could get away with it. Many women have come forward with their experiences about Brand and now the police is investigating this.
      2. Brand has been trying to profit for the last few years by grifting MAGA/QAnon folks.
      • Decompose@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        The history is filled with fabricated sexual assaults. Kavanaugh, Justin Bieber, Justin Roiland, Andy Signore, and the list goes on. They all get completely destroyed before the evidence shows in the dumb court of “public opinion”, and then they get absolved of the charges because guess what… women lie, like everyone else. Humans lie. So, we have “innocent until proven guilty” and “due process”. That, or nothing. Shut your mouth and don’t make shit up. I hope this happens to you and you get destroyed and lose everything until the evidence shows you’re innocent and then no one gives a shit. Maybe then you’ll learn, you evil little piece of shit.

    • pc_admin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who’s profiting? Can you provide an example with Brands case?

      • Decompose@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russel Brand is fighting the establishment and hurting the big pockets, see the video below, and there’s absolutely zero proof he did anything whatsoever. It’s just anonymous with zero evidence, zero investigations, and just anonymous nonsense. Once this goes to court, then we talk about legitimacy. Innocent until proven guilty.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7LgO2FIoa4

        • pc_admin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay let’s rewind a bit, I asked you to provide an example of someone who was making money off this.

          Saying “the establishment” and “big pockets” really isn’t cutting it, can you or can you not name one party who’s directly profiting off this? Can you actually prove the link between a victims testimony and someone being reimbursed?

          I need names and dollar figures, not this sensationalist rambling.

          • Decompose@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Really? OK. Let’s ask the dictionary what “profit” means. This is the first answer from Merriam Webster:

            “: a valuable return : GAIN”

            So excuse me for not having that event listed in S&P500 reports… you petty little man.