• theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

      Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

      Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

      • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

        Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?

        • twistypencil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

          Lol this is nonsense.

          First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work