I use Hetzner as a seedbox and then have PLEX as my media server ran on the same hardware. It’s worked perfectly fine for years. But recently PLEX says they will be blocking Hetzner hosting in the next few weeks. I’ve been considering moving to Jellyfin for a while, but I’m worried they will do the same thing in future.

Does anyone know if that’s a real possibility?

Also, if I setup a VPN and just download stuff I torrent from my seedbox to a local PLEX server, would I be in any more risk of legal issues then I am now?

Am I looking at this completely wrong, and I should do something completely different?

To clarify what I am thinking of doing:

Keep my Hetzner as my seedbox and continue to download using my IPTorrents account. Setup a Local Plex or Jellyfin server and download from my seedbox to that local server that will be ran behind a VPN.

UPDATE: So this past weekend I did some testing and JellyFin is now my new Media Streaming software on my server. Going to take some time to learn how it works compared to PLEX, but so far things have been nearly 1 to 1. Thanks everyone for the help, I’m very grateful.

  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been considering moving to Jellyfin for a while, but I’m worried they will do the same thing in future.

    Currently would not be possible. Jellyfin does not have the sort of centralized accounts/logins that Plex does e.g. you’re not asking Jellyfin devs for permission to log into your own server. That’s just a Plex thing.

    If you’re asking could they add that “feature” in the future? Highly unlikely but I guess anything is possible. Were that to happen most likely the code would get forked into a new project.

    PS - Jellyfin itself is a fork from Emby back when those devs decided to close their source. Myself & tons of other people dropped Emby at that point & migrated to Jellyfin. https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/about/

    • lukas@lemmy.haigner.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Plex is so bizarre. I consider myself a tech-savvy person, but I can’t wrap my head around the concept of “I host Example App on my servers. I host, maintain, and pay for the instance of Example App and servers myself. I also pay for a license for Example App. But Example Company controls my instance.” It’s so foreign to everything you can host yourself. It’s such an unfair commercial practice that I can’t for the life of me explain how such a model can survive. Self-hosting is about regaining control in my books. Yet Plex over here thinks they can not only shove down the maintenance burden and costs of everything down my throat, but also control access to my data. The solution to Plex’s retarded ToS violation situation is for Plex to say shit happens, how about we stop controlling everything you do with Plex to such an excessive degree that the media mafia can accuse us of empowering piracy instead of… the person who hosts pirated media on their server? Plex’s biggest business liability is Plex’s own business practices. They’re practically begging the media mafia to sue them.

      • hitmyspot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought the phone home was to make it easy to have different devices talk to each other. It’s similar for a lot of IoT products. If properly set up, they don’t need to phone home and can find each other with the setting ayku input. However, many users are less technical and automating this through a central service makes it easier. Most companies also use this to scoop up personal info too, unfortunately.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’re trying to double as a streaming platform (like roku channel, tubi, etc) for mass-market media. that creates a conflict between the big studios licensing that content to them and the platform’s common historical use case. they may have to choose ‘one or the other’, and i would not be surprised if further ‘actions’ are taken by plex to curb (or outright remove support for) media ‘sharing’.

        • lukas@lemmy.haigner.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or neither option: Launch a streaming platform. No, don’t morph smth everyone loves into a streaming platform. Plex’s marketing for their streaming vision is so piss poor that the only people who know about it use Plex for a use case that clashes with this new vision.

    • Vaggumon@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t had a chance to do the research yet, so pardon a dumb question that might have an easy answer. With the setup I’ve described, would JellyFin just be a drop in replacement or would I need to drastically change things to get the same basic work flow?

      • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Offhand it sounds like it could be a drop in replacement for you. But there are a lot of other variables you’d need to consider e.g. if you require specific app/TV support & don’t like the current Jellyfin offerings.

        Maybe others can clarify or you can post with any specific requirements/questions in the Jellyfin forums or the lemmy communities [email protected] / [email protected]

        That aside you could always just try it out & see how you like it.

        • Vaggumon@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ultimately, I think that is what I am doing, but figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask someone with experience with the software already just in case there was an obviouls big red stop sign I was missing. Looks like I have other plans this weekend then playing more Stanfield or Baluder’s Gate 3. Thanks for the help and info.