• Echinoderm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While there is plenty of scope for justifiable criticism about the form of the amendment that’s going ahead, it’s too late for that argument to achieve much. The wording is set, the date is set, the taxpayer money is already being spent.

    Since it is going ahead anyway, do you think voting no will make governments revisit further steps in the future faster than a yes vote?

    Personally, I doubt it would. Progress is more likely to be gained by having something, no matter how small, already in place so that a future amendment can build on it, rather than trying for something more substantial from scratch.

    • WhirlybirdM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I don’t think voting no will hold it back more than voting yes. I think Yes winning would just allow the slacktivists to put the cue back in the rack and pat themselves on the back and say they solved racism so don’t need to do anything else. Either way I’m not expecting anything more to be done for a decade or 2 anyway unfortunately.