• Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brick manufacturing devastates the environment. We build our houses from sustainable resources.because we’re not cavemen.

    • Quaiche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile most of your energy sources are not renewable and per capita the average emissions of the American is double or even triple of the average European.

    • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why the aggressive tone? Each technique has its advantages. I guess brick and mortar houses would burn less in California, which has the same climate as Italy and Spain

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whether or not the house burns to the ground is irrelevant when the damage caused by the heat alone would condemn a brick/stone house in the US. At least wood frame houses can be easily tore down and rebuilt.

    • leotonius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is not the reasoning at all.

      Places generally build with whatever sensical building material they have most widely available. If there are a ton of forests, they probably build with wood. If there’s a ton of stone, they probably build with stone.

      You’re wrong, and honestly kind of a dick.