• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I get that he’s financing it, but that’s not sustainable if you want to implement something similar around the country.

    I love the idea, and the tiny house village looks amazing! But if it relies on a millionaire to voluntarily subsidize the project, I can’t see it lasting too long.

    Now, that brings us to a wonderful new option: tax the rich more than we do.

    The top 5 billionaires could fund 1000s of these tiny home villages with just a fraction of a percent increase on their hoarded wealth.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Public services don’t need to be profitable to be sustainable. You just need to tax base to be okay with it.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, I don’t want them to be profitable, but sustainable.

        Even if taxpayers are paying for it, you can’t rely on the (struggling) general population to lift people out of homelessness. Let the rich carry that burden. They are the ones who’ve hoarded money that should have gone to everyone else.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          hoarded money that should have gone to everyone else

          That’s not how money works?

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            Yes, because hoarding billions means it was stolen from someone else. Either through low wages, low taxes, loopholes, or unethical business practices.

            Nobody should ever be able to accumulate billions of dollars. We have people who will be trillionaires in our lifetime. Unjustifiable.

            • iii@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 minutes ago

              means it was stolen from someone else

              No it isn’t? Usually it just means owning stock in a company, that others want to buy.