• Crozekiel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t feel like nationalizing Starlink for the USA is best for everyone. It is a world-wide network, I feel like it would be better as something that isn’t controlled by any single country (but, obviously I agree it should not be controlled by a single billionaire fuck-boy either…).

    • Grellan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go check out who runs GPS. Starling being nationalized isn’t happening, but if it did the service would likely keep on keeping on.

      • Crozekiel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        GPS is quite a bit different. The satellites just orbit and send the same information out. The user device doesn’t have to send anything back - the “communication” is only 1-way. Also, GPS is significantly further out from the planet and involves a lot less satellites, so it is not really feasible to turn them off specifically targeting a small area or an individual target - you’d have to black out a huge chunk of the planet to reliably block “an enemy” from using it.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why shouldn’t something a billionaire built be controlled by said billionaire and his company? You guys really do just want communism don’t you?