U.S. officials familiar with the planning said options for “reclaiming” the vital waterway include close cooperation with Panama’s military and, absent that, possible war.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      He wants to be a strongman and he realizes peoples’ impression of him is nearly as small as his penis.

    • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Because you can’t really invade a place full of white people like Greenland or Canada. Even the diehard Trump fans would probably not be okay with that. On the other hand, a country full of poor, brown people that have only ever been fucked over by America? Well shit, we can’t wait to bomb them! George Carlin explained it, America loves bombing brown people. Anyone in the US military with the slightest amount of backbone will not follow these illegal orders. See the Nuremberg Trials if you’re not sure what an illegal order looks like. They aren’t even trying with a WMD hoax, this is just an illegal invasion.

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Even the diehard Trump fans would probably not be okay

        Given the number of diehard trump fans who wish harm to other members of the US and agitate for an internal war, I doubt this is true for the majority of them.

      • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Give Fox News 6 months of their two minutes hate bullshit and Trumpers will be frothing at the mouth for Canadian blood. Americans have already proven that we’ll follow a blatant liar into war if the propaganda sets the tone for it.

        • sloppychops@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          And then in 10 years everyone gets to pretend that they were ‘against it the whole time’ like they did with the Iraq War.

        • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Maybe, but relationships between the American and Canadian military are way too entrenched, even if it was a direct order, it’s pretty hard to suddenly point your weapons at someone who’s been a dedicated ally. Though I won’t blame Canadians for being more than a little pissed for quite some time, I just don’t see how this would actually happen.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I entirely agree we shouldn’t do it, but I don’t believe it would necessarily be an illegal order to follow.

        Invading a sovereign country for overtly offensive reasons isn’t against any particular military law, it’s just shitty.

        The president doesn’t have the power to declare war, only to do everything involved in a war, but I don’t think that would actually make any of the orders illegal, unless they were to explicitly do some war crimes or some such.

        • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I get what you’re saying, though maybe when America becomes the new nazis, we can have a Nuremberg Trial 2.0 and set some new precedents!

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Putin knows that one of the quickest ways to destroy the US is if the rest of western civilization abandons it. Russia saw firsthand how quickly nearly the entire world joined in to sanction and abandon them when they invaded Ukraine with that bullshit story. The Panama shit is an even worse excuse, almost guaranteed to turn the western world fully against the US.

      However, it’s also physically separated enough from the US that Americans at home that don’t pay attention won’t be directly affected to turn against it with retaliation, the Republican base is racist and narcissistic enough to back it seriously, and with a large enough power imbalance so unlike Ukraine there’s no chance of a prolonged conflict.

      The infrastructure isn’t in place yet for them to just do whatever they want and arrest every protester like Russia does, so they do have to still take that into account, Panama is remote and unknown to a large portion of the population sadly. But the building of Panama Canal is something that many learned about in school as a pivotal historical infrastructure project. Something still in use today and referenced in the news even though they may not know where it is. For the America is Best narcissist, taking back what “we” built is an admirable goal.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      My theory:

      Panama controls a major trade route and charges shitloads of money for each ship that passes.

      Same reason for Canada. The North-West Passage is melting and will be open year round in the not too distant future.

      The same makes sense for Greenland if you consider Russia as a trade partner with lots of raw metals. Plus Greenland itself may have oil. Again, this when the ice melts completely.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      The lake that feeds it is not recharging fast enough so they’re limiting passage of ships and making them take longer and more dangerous routes. So he’s probably planning to commit ecocide on the lake for the handful of years it can sustain the canal at max capacity but long enough to stymie other routes being planned or built.