• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      Kind of a two-fer right there. Without “AI” sucking up so much power, we’d already be better off climate-wise.

        • biofaust@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          I wrote Generative AI. Do you want to put the two on the same scale of complexity?

            • biofaust@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I agree. Still it is a set with way fewer elements than action against climate change. Also, the nature of operations in the latter case is way more diversified than in the development of the former.

              It is only my opinion though, you may find Generative AI a hydra compared to the other.

              By the way, the money would be well spent indeed but not even close to enough for a sustainable change.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                idk about that last part actually. some of the stuff we can do for the climate we just aren’t doing.

                also we could just hire a few hitmen

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Buying companies that create a lot of pollution and closing them down. (Coal mines/plants, oil firms, single use plastic suppliers, etc)

        Another big one would be buying up pharma companies an their patents and releasing everything under creative commons license.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is a singular endeavor with tons of moving parts, like pretty much every modern endeavor.

        • biofaust@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          My problem with counting all climate change is that the goal itself is not unique: there are atmospheric greenhouse gasses to lower, which are something completely different than the acidification of the oceans, which are completely different from deforestation.

          And the effects themselves are, it’s true, all originated from an imbalance in a system, but exactly because climate is a complex system, they differ wildly.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m sure you’ll get a bunch of respectable answers, but keep in mind that secretly, everyone is actually thinking sex robots.

    • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d rather a free and powerful energy source that’ll benefit humanity not have a logo and pricetag slapped on it so that only the ones who can afford it are allowed to use it.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Any energy source is going to be able to have a price tag and a logo slapped on it as long as energy generation requires infrastructure and capitalism is a thing. Wind, solar, and tidal are great; we desperately need more of them as part of our energy strategy. But they can also have a price tag and a logo. In fact, home solar has become quite a lucrative…well, not exactly scam, but “bad deal” in my area.

        And fusion will have to be here, too, to fill the gaps that wind, solar, and tidal leave; at least for now. There’s no “forever” answer here, only some that’ll last longer than others.

          • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Precisely. It’s already done to our homes and our food and the water we drink, pretty soon it will be done to the air we breath unless we stop that unnamable thing that privatizes wealth and is defined by the ability to profit from it.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    how about pocket computers with the power of a smartphone but the common sense usability of a goddamn graphing calculator? i’m sitting on a magic rectangle with more computing power than the apollo mission and it doesn’t even let me blink the LED without installing an app?? these things should legally have to come with a scripting environment.

      • nycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        the closest thing on android right now is an app called Termux, it simulates a linux scripting environment with several languages (including C, python, and javascript), and it can be programmed to do anything an app can do (including blink the LED).

        but c’mon, that should be standard. also phones should come rooted.

  • Phineaz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Cultured Meat. Without relying on any major breakthroughs, a price competitive with “traditional” meat is feasible with a few rather reasonable and conservative assumptions and developments. Dropping cows as meat source globally alone might be sufficient to slow down further climate change significantly.

      • Phineaz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why would I need an immune system in CM? This is food. It’s cells, generally on a scaffold, that look like either ground meat or a steak or whatever you want. If you mean vasculature: That is an issue if you want to print organs or large, intact tissue, less so for foodstuffs.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Lack of immune system means everything has to be perfectly sterile, it has been the entire problem with scaling up. Entire batches regularly rot.

          there is currently no viable solution to this, that’s why investors are backing out.

          • Phineaz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Everything has to be perfectly sterile anyway, this is cell culture. Open tops STRs are not exactly a thing. It doesn’t have to be pharma grade, sure, but food safety is a thing and you’re not going to get a process certified without it. Main issue remains to be the cost of medium, serum-free or not.

            I do wonder where you got that idea from, though. I don’t intend to be rude, but have you got any kind of experience in the field?

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Yeah that’s the problem… farms don’t have to be sterile. scaling that up has proven to be almost impossible. Cost of the medium is just one of the problems

              I am very interested in the topic and follow it closely, here’s a recent video on the topic summarizing the problem made by a food scientist

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPCnVwwENaQ

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Torn between up voting the sentiment and down voting politics - I really don’t think this counts as a tech endeavor.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Finding new and unique ways to make parabolic mirrors more efficiently and inexpensively

    Imagine being into generative AI when the moon is literally red as I type this. You could be looking at the Orion Nebula right now instead of staring at a screen playing charades with a soulless marionette dancing under the hands of billionaires who you’re giving a direct line straight into your brain, bypassing all critical thought

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Software that is both ridiculously easy to use and able to bypass any and all DRM schemes past, present, and future. As a firm believer that any form of computer (not including game consoles because I don’t care about them) software that severely limits when, where, and how you can use your legally purchased games, movies, e-books, etcetera, should be outright illegal, this is my answer.