• uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honey, nobody claims that trans women are biologically identical to cis women or the other way around. Sex is not gender.

      And chromosomal deviations is exactly what the PhD in the OP is talking about. You can call them medical conditions if you like, but that doesn’t change the fact that there are XY women and XX cis men.

        • pack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          just because of a wig and makeup

          Why do bigots always assume trans women can’t grow their own hair?

          Is the assumption seriously that your average trans woman looks like a burly bearded man with a receding hairline?

        • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          My only pet peeve with all this is “misgendering” which I honestly despise. If one is a grown up 180cm male I’m never gonna call him a “her” just because of a wig and makeup.

          Interesting.

          What if they were 165cm, had the face and body and voice of a woman and you had no idea they were trans? Would you call them He if you found out?

          Would you call a big burly bearded guy She after you found out they are a trans man?

          If yes, why so? If no, why so?

    • iltg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      so we agree that

      1: one 2: two

      and then there are just some numbers in between, 0.1, 0.2…

      this is just a fact, you coming in these comments wielding words you don’t understand and concepts you barely grasps doesn’t make you smart or correct

      you’re just a bigot regardless