zhunk@beehaw.org to Space@beehaw.org · 1 year agoNASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordablearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1108arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkNASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordablearstechnica.comzhunk@beehaw.org to Space@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarezhunk@beehaw.orgOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoIt looks like there are a few new articles since this one came out: https://spacenews.com/gao-report-calls-for-more-transparency-on-sls-costs/ https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/gao-nasa-not-transparent-about-unaffordable-sls-costs/ Neither of those mention SpaceX at all, and the OP article just mentions them and Blue in the context of engine prices.
minus-squareHypx@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThere are Republicans in government too. They will always sell out to corporations over public interest.
It looks like there are a few new articles since this one came out:
https://spacenews.com/gao-report-calls-for-more-transparency-on-sls-costs/
https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/gao-nasa-not-transparent-about-unaffordable-sls-costs/
Neither of those mention SpaceX at all, and the OP article just mentions them and Blue in the context of engine prices.
There are Republicans in government too. They will always sell out to corporations over public interest.