• thereisalamp@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The juxtaposition of “anyone he wants without raping them” against “sentenced to 30 years for rape” has a pretty clear contextual implication that you intentionally ignored.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Feel free to point out where that was referenced in the comment I was replying to.

      I didn’t ignore it, it wasn’t relevant.

      • thereisalamp@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s literally the title of the post my dude.

        That was said in response to the context of Danny Masterson being sentenced to jail for rape.

        It is relevant, and you are choosing to die on the hill of pedantry on a point no one but you is actually asserting. You choose to take a figure of speech, that was a juxtaposition of the title of the article and apply an absolute. It doesn’t read that easy to anyone who isn’t making a choice to omit the context.