• BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Studies like this are important to counter the reactionary perspective that giving money to those experiencing housing will just feed addiction.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair they did exclude people who had severe levels of addiction from this program.

      That being said, there’s more homeless people without severe addictions than with them so the logic still works.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re vastly overestimating the proportion of people against social safety nets who would change their tune when presented with indisputable evidence that they are wrong.

      • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, i feel you, but once you have data, you no longer have to even entertain those people in debate. You just act based on the data.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Too bad the people that ignore it are the ones making those decisions in the first place

          • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Truth. Even the Dems in my state capital spent more time denigrating the housing first homeless advocate than they did discussing their own policies as mayor (which of course are just more of the same). Thankfully the dude who won was at least semi-progressive, he’s already declared a state of emergency and opened hundreds of beds. Here’s hoping he keeps it up and other places get similar quality politicians. In the meantime, I recommend joining your local Food Not Bombs if you can and getting to know your disaffected and unhoused communities.

    • L_EnferCestLesAutres@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The study specifically selected people with no substance abuse problem… if anything the author of the study were wary of what you say is a reactionary perspective.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They intentionally didn’t give the money to those with addictions though, so it doesn’t counter that at all.