Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    6 hours ago

    so Firefox now has terms of use with this text in them:

    When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

    this is bad. it feels like the driving force behind this are the legal requirements behind Mozillaā€™s AI features that nobody asked for, but functionally these terms give Mozilla the rights to everything you do in Firefox effectively without limitation (because legally, the justification they give could apply to anything you do in your browser)

    I havenā€™t taken the rebranded forks of Firefox very seriously before, but they might be worth taking a close look at now, since apparently these terms of use only apply to the use of mainline Firefox itself and not any of the rebrands

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      Sigh. Not long ago I switched from Vivaldi back to Firefox because it has better privacy-related add-ons. Since a while ago, on one machine as a test, Iā€™ve been using LibreWolf, after I went down the rabbit hole of ā€œhow do I configure Firefox for privacy, including that it doesnā€™t send stuff to Mozillaā€ and was appalled how difficult that is. Now with this latest bullshit from Mozillaā€¦ guess Iā€™ll switch everything over to LibreWolf now, or go back to Vivaldiā€¦

      Really hope theyā€™ll leave Thunderbird alone with such crapā€¦

      I often wish I could just give up on web browsers entirely, but unfortunately thatā€™s not practical.

    • Steve@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      I hate how much firefox has been growing to this point of being the best, by a smaller and smaller margin, of a fucking shit bunch

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      Yeahā€¦that could be a real deal breaker. Doesnā€™t this give them the right to MITM all traffic coming through the browser?