You were arguing with a different person, I just don’t like it when pseudo intellectuals try to deflect valid criticism by incorrectly citing logical fallacies.
Don’t care enough to argue with you about the rights and wrongs of violence. But I do care enough to point out that it’s also not a false equivalence.
You are very clearly stating that violence ALWAYS wrong. That’s what you said, I think verbatim?
They are giving you a scenario where they think violence was not wrong.
You are better off not talking about logical fallacies, it’s making you seem dumber than I am sure you actually are.
And you’re better off not accusing others of pseudo intellectualism with a comment history that reads like a cautionary tale on how not to be aggressively obnoxious.
You were arguing with a different person, I just don’t like it when pseudo intellectuals try to deflect valid criticism by incorrectly citing logical fallacies.
Don’t care enough to argue with you about the rights and wrongs of violence. But I do care enough to point out that it’s also not a false equivalence.
You are very clearly stating that violence ALWAYS wrong. That’s what you said, I think verbatim?
They are giving you a scenario where they think violence was not wrong.
You are better off not talking about logical fallacies, it’s making you seem dumber than I am sure you actually are.
And you’re better off not accusing others of pseudo intellectualism with a comment history that reads like a cautionary tale on how not to be aggressively obnoxious.
How do you like them apples?