• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    As hokey as the novels are, I like the Dresden Files’ explanation for this. Where the symbol itself doesn’t actually matter, it’s a person’s unwavering faith into what that symbol represents.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how it works in VTM too. I remember reading about a vampire that got wrecked by a credit card, as the businessman wielding it believed in the power of money.

    • neoman4426@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kind of like I am Legend’s take, it’s not a universal thing, it’s not the faith of the user, it’s the former faith of the vampire itself being reminded of what they’ve lost

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m allergic to On the Origin of Species and The Selfish Gene.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually think that works really well in a personal horror context like VtM. It’s all about how you’ve changed and what you are now. You can no longer have a connection to your god like you once did.

        But in something like Hunter: The Reckoning where the threat is more externalised the power coming from the wielder makes more sense. And obviously being in the same setting, you can’t really do both of them.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that’s how vampire actually works? There was a True Faith merit I think. But it’s been a while since I played Masquerade. I don’t think holy symbols do anything in requiem unless the wielder has a special trait to make it so.