Low birthrate and ageing population pose ‘an urgent risk to society’, but can opening its borders to skilled overseas workers fix the problem?

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh, this is not an “urgent risk to society” this is an example that the whole world should follow

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is that you still need a productive group of people to fund and care for retirees. Japan has the ability to absorb millions in its rural towns. It just doesn’t.

      • botengang@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not as easy as absorbing people into rural towns and I suspect you know that.

          • botengang@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So you’re going to have towns full of retired old people? Maybe also include their caretakers and maybe service workers supplying everything the caretakers need. Oh, and schools for the caretakers children. And teachers, obviously. And maybe some industry for the caretakers spouses to work at.

            Retirees aren’t going to keep towns alive. They’re just usually among the last to leave.

      • kalleboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Immigrants don’t want to live in rural towns. I remember when a group of refugees were bussed in Sweden and they revolted that they didn’t get to stay in a city.

        I mean even LOCAL people don’t want to live in rural towns, that’s why they’re depopulated.