• IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress. Those mechanic shops can transition to working on trains, bikes, EVs, etc. We can do both.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      IMO, I can’t see how making progress on car maintainability would be easier than on car dependency.

      One depends on local politics, the other on national (or maybe even national to a foreign nation) politics or somehow convincing a global oligopolist to lose a bit of money to help your cause.

      But if you want to work on it, good luck and all the power to you. Don’t stop just because another problem exists.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Oh, I’m not trying to say either are going to be easy, but they both have their individual benefits and there’s some overlap. Having more community-based knowledge of internal combustion engines could still help people switch to motorcycles as a start.

        You also never know when someone will make a connection that’s never been thought of before, and completely change how we think about transportation, and the more knowledge in more people’s hands, the better.

        Just trying to say it’s a “Yes, and” situation.