• gubblebumbum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most disorders/diseases are too complex to have a short name that accuratley describes what they are so I don’t think a disorder being ‘poorly’ named is that big of a deal.

      • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        And add colours and levels for extra flavour.

        They are diagnosed with Green Level 3 Wombleypoos, just keep them away from the level 2’s to avoid the floop scenario!

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most of my mates are some flavour, colour and level of Wombleypoo, but tbqh I’ve never considered whether - like star signs - there may be incompatibilities there

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, this is why I am a fan of naming them after patient zero, or the first to diagnose etc.

      • fristislurper@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The WHO discourages this because people will start associating the name with the disease. Which sucks if you happen to have this name. See Tourette’s, or Chagas disease.

        You can read a bit about it here.