• Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no reason to fake the certification documents unless you’re not following the required standards.

    Why would a manufacturer go through all the effort and expense to make parts at the required standards, with hugely expensive manufacturing, only to take on a huge risk to save a negligible amount on the paperwork? That is a horrible business decision.

    • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The paperwork cost isn’t negligible at all. For example a company I used to work for had to replace a simple O-ring that failed. It’s an old part and quite rare these days and cost $800 to replace. You could buy a functionally equivalent (likely better) uncertified part for about 5 cents. That is why uncertified parts are such a problem, because certified ones are so incredibly expensive. Plenty of companies would love to step in and buy a few thousand O rings and sell them for $400 and a few are willing to forge a paper trail to make it happen. It’s a problem that I don’t really think will be ever totally solved without making certification too easy and potentially sacrificing safety by having bad certified parts.

      • tastysnacks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you spent $800 on an oring and it fails and the plane goes down, the manufacturer is liable. If you spent $0.05 on the oring and the plane goes down, you’re liable. Like you said, paperwork isn’t cheap. Because its basically liability insurance. If you made the oring, would you accept liability for $0.05?