• maniacalmanicmaniaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think any unilateral changes will spark debate among Syrians and not just westerners regardless of the issue. Sometimes when a story is covered by multiple outlets with different perspectives, translations or editorial styles I have to wing it and choose one to share. I did find it odd that Landis was the first person quoted and he wasn’t necessarily critical fd the changes, perhaps his post was getting a lot of traction at the time in Syria or among Syrians.

      Another.post in the issue:

      Syria’s Education Ministry clarifies curriculum amendment decision

      There are links at the bottom of that article to.other interesting developments in education

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Additionally, texts addressing the Ottoman Empire’s rule, previously described in the Syrian curriculum as “the brutal Ottoman authority,” are set to be removed entirely.

    I am curious why the section on Ottoman rule was removed completely.

    • maniacalmanicmaniaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s interesting. Perhaps it’s all just one person’s hasty edits and they just happen to think the empire wasn’t all that bad.