ShroOmeric@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMIT Economist Daron Acemoğlu Takes on Big Tech: "Our Future Will Be Very Dystopian"www.spiegel.deexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1170arrow-down17
arrow-up1163arrow-down1external-linkMIT Economist Daron Acemoğlu Takes on Big Tech: "Our Future Will Be Very Dystopian"www.spiegel.deShroOmeric@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareCheeseisgood1981@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago You are making very different argument, But they’re not. They’re making these ame point, an you just said you agreed with it. What is the point of the rest of your responses? Like, the person you’re responding to laid out the argument from the article, you said “nah, but if they said that I would totally be on their side”. Then, they pointed out how the article definitely made the point they’re saying it made and gave you a citation. Then, you went, " nah, fam. RE: Windmills - That’s crazy talk". Brother, you demonstrably said you agreed with them if they were making the point they obviously made. What are you doing?
But they’re not. They’re making these ame point, an you just said you agreed with it. What is the point of the rest of your responses?
Like, the person you’re responding to laid out the argument from the article, you said “nah, but if they said that I would totally be on their side”.
Then, they pointed out how the article definitely made the point they’re saying it made and gave you a citation.
Then, you went, " nah, fam. RE: Windmills - That’s crazy talk".
Brother, you demonstrably said you agreed with them if they were making the point they obviously made. What are you doing?