• WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Source for anyone interested. I was initially confused since New York got rid of the death penalty decades ago, but it’s from a new federal charge I hadn’t seen yet.

    As far as I can find they haven’t officially said they’re pursuing the death penalty for this charge just that this charge is eligible for it. I see no other reason for it though.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/dec/19/luigi-mangione-eligible-death-penalty-new-federal-/

    • madthumbs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not to discredit the opinion, but don’t most school shooters (if not all -I don’t really pay attention) get killed on site and also have a personal grievance rather than just manipulation by media and statistics? Mangione seemed poised to become a serial killer. If he’s free’d, it tells society it’s ok to go around killing allegedly bad people (and ~20% of us are incredibly gullible conspiracy theorists -percent will be higher on certain sites on the internet as opposed to real life).

      We also have to wonder how much more effective long term Mangione could have been alive and free.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mangione seemed poised to become a serial killer.

        That’s pure speculation. And I hate to tell you this but people don’t typically get sentence for “future crimes”.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        He killed a serial killer. And killing multiple serial killers is a societal good (as long as the state isn’t the one doing the killing).

        • madthumbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Denying people certain services does not equate to murder.

          Should I kill a CEO for approving VIOXX which caused heart disease, intense abdominal pain, and GERD? -How about the doctor for prescribing it over an extremely minor issue? -Then there’s the subsequent prescription ant-acids that can cause stomach cancer. -What about their responsibility when lemon water with cayenne worked as good or better?

          When I tore rotator cuffs, I was denied surgery from the insurance company because they were only up to 40% tears. -I recovered for the most part and am glad I didn’t get the risky surgery.

          I was told I needed a hernia operatation (umbilical). Other people got it and ended up needing follow up surgery. Every surgery is a risk of your life.

          So without knowing specifics (I have yet to see any among all this nonsense), I’m not supporting blatant killing which is what Mangione did. -Or show me how the CEO was directly responsible without resorting to propaganda (which statistics typically are).