This guy is clearly snooping the downvoters as an instance admin and retaliating against them. Wouldn’t even have noticed if I didn’t stumble onto the modlog in Voyager by accident.

I might be of course wrong in my assumption. But I don’t remember ever interacting with anyone from that instance, I’m not subscribed to those communities and the dates correlate.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Huh? I’m not sure what you mean.

    The policies specify that they intend to be proactive about down vote “brigading”.

    They aren’t saying you can’t down vote reasonably, just that they apply a threshold beyond which, you get banned preemptively.

    It isn’t like “power tripping” has a precise definition that’s universal, so it comes down to individual usages of the term. For me, it’s like I already explained. That’s my criteria, what’s yours?

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The admin was downvoted 3 times, across one discussion. In a community not on their server, and not their post. Calling that ‘brigading’ is ridiculous. From other comments in this post, it’s happened to others too. Somebody mentioned getting banned for 5 downvotes spread across several weeks. It sounds like any criticism of the admin would merit a ban. Regardless of where your individual borders lie for defining power tripping, I don’t see how this would fail to qualify.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean, great, you can rant about it if you want. Feel free, it doesn’t hurt anything.

        I already gave my criteria in the first comment. Feel free to use your own in making a top level comment too. Heck, make a post about, it if you like.

        But, I gotta say, that if you’re just looking to argue about it, you’re wasting your time. I gave my opinion, stated the grounds for that opinion, and see no reason to change it to satisfy some internet rando that can’t be bothered to answer a direct and clear question.