1. Post in [email protected] attacks the entire concept of AI safety as a made-up boogeyman
  2. I disagree and am attacked from all sides for “posting like an evangelist”
  3. I give citations for things I thought would be obvious, such as that AI technology in general has been improving in capability compared to several years ago
  4. Instance ban, “promptfondling evangelist”

This one I’m not aggrieved about as much, it’s just weird. It’s reminiscent of the lemmy.ml type of echo chamber where everyone’s convinced it’s one way, because in a self-fulfilling prophecy, anyone who is not convinced gets yelled at and receives a ban.

Full context: https://ponder.cat/post/1030285 (Some of my replies were after the ban because I didn’t PT Barnum carefully enough, so didn’t realize.)

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is a controversial take (by US standards)

    The only people in denial about corruption within us government and corporate systems are boomers.

    Clearly most common folk know the deal hence why Luigi is a hero and we don’t even know if he actually destroyed that parasit Brian Thompson

    • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s been a while since I’ve been/lived in the US (I do have close friends who lived there though), but I disagree. It seemed like a general social issue that crosses all demographic segments.