A woman is dead following a “tragic chain of events” that began with a bomb threat against Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene at her Rome home, police said.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    and if equipment was needed it would have met them there.

    Ahhh… Okay. But wait, the equipment can’t teleport or drive itself there, right? So maybe this person was doing that, getting the equipment there, so other people could drive straight there?

    Tell me again why he had to kill this woman?

    They never said that, lol

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      What do you mean maybe this person was doing that? Where are on Earth you getting that from? They’re absolutely implying the death of this woman was justifiable due to an emergency. An emergency that didn’t exist. Which I note that you didn’t address at all.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Where? They only said it wasn’t click bait and that the accident happened while the officer was responding. “They’re absolutely implying the death of this woman was justifiable due to an emergency.” They never ever say it was justifiable. Show me where.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I said implying genius you just quoted me saying that. By saying that the motors was hit while the police were responding. That part. That’s called justification.

          I noticed yet again you ignored the pertinent part of my comment though. Almost like you don’t want to bring it up.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I didn’t answer that part because it was irrelevant to anything I was saying. And no, I don’t agree that saying an officer responding to something getting into an accident “implies” it is justified. Much less do I agree that someone stating that fact means they’re implying they personally thought it was justified.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Stating a fact? What fact? Because if you’re going to say it’s a fact they were responding to a bomb threat then it seems like you do need to address the other point. The one you’ve been dancing around the entire time. The one that invalidates everything else you’ve been saying.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                What the fuck am I dancing around? I was just saying that the officer was driving to the HQ and in the process of responding to a threat.

                Listen, this story is fucked. There’s like a million fuck ups involved. We don’t need to make up new ones to criticize them. An officer getting into a wreck and killing someone is bad regardless of whether they’re in the process of responding to a call or not or even on duty at all. The fact that they were responding to a threat (however fucking late lmao, I would’ve expected the mailbox blown up by the) doesn’t change it. It’s stupid and awful.

                I’m not dancing around anything. You’re equating people correcting that the officer was responding to a dispatch (as opposed to just driving to work as part of their commute or something) while they got into a wreck that killed someone as them saying that makes it okay, but nobody has said that. Nobody has tried to say anything anywhere close to something like this was some sort of acceptable collateral damage of the policing process lol.

                  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I absolutely cannot deal with you. You’re being intentionally obtuse. They got a bomb threat. Yes, it ended up being fake. They didn’t know that at the time.

                    As dystopian as American police are, they do not have full on Minority Report style precogs using magical psychic powers to discern if a bomb threat is real or not the moment it is received.

                    And, again, because I feel like you’re missing my point, I’m not defending them. None of this was acceptable. I’m, literally, only saying they didn’t yet know the threat was fake. That’s it.