• pixelscript@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d rather have multiple monitors so I have the more intuituve window snapping. But to each their own.

    • gazter
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m firmly in both camps. Window snapping is much more flexible on a single monitor- I can’t really do quarters on a side-by-side setup, but I can on an ultrawide. However, I love having a second monitor in portrait.

      Until they make T shaped displays that I can mount sideways, to get the best of both worlds, I guess my best option is a single massive screen, where I only use a thin strip of one half.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Until they make T shaped displays that I can mount sideways, to get the best of both worlds

        Were you also a proud owner of an LG Wing? 😉